Why aren't kids readers any more?
Well – some still are.
When my girls were little girls, I read to them, and I mean I read to them a lot. It started with the board books and Pat the Bunny and Goodnight Moon and Brown Bear, Brown Bear and the singsong sillies of Dr. Seuss. My older daughter had One Fish, Two Fish memorized when she was two, and we’d laugh as we read along, her sitting in my lap in the rocker, with me reading the first part of a sentence, and her finishing it off, smiling and proud. She loved receiving books as gifts - especially big books.
As she grew older, we went to the library together and I let her choose her own books in the children’s section. Some were crap. Some weren’t. But I let her choose. And she watched me looking over my choices, and I’d tell her why I chose what I chose – how much I loved this or that author, and why, and maybe where they were from, if I knew, and why what they wrote mattered to me. And I’d tell it like a story.
My second daughter had the same experience, but doubled, as she watched her sister choosing books and reading them.
And I told my girls how much I loved books, right on down to how they smelled. And we’d open books and smell the pages together. And I told them the pages were a kind of magic, because when you opened up a book and began to read what was inside, you were opening up a new place to go and be inside of, and when you came back out again, there you were, right there in your snuggly chair, and wasn’t that amazing? They loved that – the magic of it. They read a lot.
When my second little one, Blondie, grew, and she came to about the age of five or six, she wanted to collect Sky Dancer books – commercial crappola, in my opinion, riding the wave of popularity of this cartoon show that was popular for a few years –but the books were colorful and magical looking, all pink and purple and sparkly, so we had a weekly ritual of driving a mile or so to our Barnes & Noble and looking at the display rack to pick a new one out, and when there wasn’t one, we talked to the ‘book lady’ and she ordered one for Blondie. Blondie loved that. And I never said her choice was bad – I said wasn’t it wonderful to go to the bookstore and come out with books to keep in her collection? Because there was always more than one book carried out the Barnes door in her little bag.
All of this happened just before the tipping point of the onslaught tidal wave of cells and laptops and MP3s and Game Things and on and on and on.
I didn’t realize until after people started talking so much about the death of reading, that the death of the singular pleasure of holding onto the pages of and reading a book could ever occur.
In my family, reading is like breathing. And I think it’s because of the magic world, the separate world, the girls learned they held in their hands when what they held in their hands was a book. They have all the gadgets, but still they keep reading.
I had some time to breathe freely one day, and in my newly breezy brain walked a memory of a trip my father and I took to the library when I was little. And how we sat together in lawn chairs in the back yard later on when we arrived home, him reading his book, me reading mine, sipping our iced teas under the shade of our gnarly never-pruned mulberry tree, each in our own held and separate world, yet still together. He taught me about the magic of reading. That it was never a chore holding on to the pages. That it was, instead, a tactile magic traveling. In a kind of a generational ceremony, what I’d done was pass the magic on.
I’m no perfect parent, that’s for sure. I’ve made mistakes and I’ve taken missteps, just like anybody does that’s doing a long, hard slog of a job that sometimes seems never-ending. Sometimes you get tired. Sometimes you screw up. Sometimes, you’re just wrong.
But I’m so relieved that, on the list of good things I managed to do, I passed this good magic on to my girls, because I think it matters.
How about you? What do you think? Are physical books gonna stick around, pages and all? Does it matter?
Friday, May 23, 2008
Reading...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
29 comments:
Everybody is talking about that these days. It's starting to scare me.
I think books are here to stay. Moonrat posted something similar, and I don't want to copy and paste, but basically I think the internet and physical books stores can live side by side.
But the other part of your post, about the competition for time, is real. I think (hope) it can still be side by side. Both my boys would give their right arms to have more play time on the DS or Playstation, but they also become so absorbed when reading (patting myelf on the back! heheh!) As in all things, it's about balance. I think.
I just saw Indiana Jones, and boy am I disappointed. I don't usually get disappointed by movies. I have a high tolerance threshold. But it really sucked. A waste of time and money. I'll have to play the originals for my kids when we're back home.
This is a tricky one.
The problem with the youth of today is that they're young and stupid, and all the people selling them their Young And Stupid Stuff are not. That's why the kids wear jeans round their kneecaps. Give them a zappy ebook plug-in for their cell phone which means they have to carry less around (ie books) and you can take it as read that the till will ker-ching. As adults, we don't have the luxury of laziness. We're a much easier target. Aren't CDs easier than vinyl? I mean — aren't they?
So, in spite of the smell and the feel and the sound and the whole analogue delight of ink on bound paper, I think it's almost inevitable that the book will lose out to the ebook to some degree — perhaps even massively. Ultimately, what matters is the quality of the writing. Shakespeare will still be Shakespeare whether he's printed, flickered onscreen or tattooed on a mooses arse. It's a horrible thing, but we can't help being the product of our own times. We may care for our own nostalgia but successive generations probably won't.
That said, I've just had a whiff an old Charles Dickens and may need to lie down.
While we're on the subject, if you have access to BBC TV progs via the miracle of satellite (or repeats) watch out for a fascinating documentary on the invention of the Gutenberg Press narrated by Stephen Fry. It's transfixing stuff.
I just found this op-ed piece from, well, a long time ago. I thought it related to WO's comment.
"... Flimsy and insubstantial, this new technology is easily defeated by even the most simple catastrophes. Spill your water? Lose all your data. And never give it to a child.
'Paper' (or 'papyrus' as the inventor likes to call it) will never replace the stone tablet. Stone does not tear or smudge. It lasts for eons Would you want your tomb built from paper? Of course not. Do you want your writing to rot like dead leaves from the tree?
Stone is simply a far more satisfying medium. The solid and gritty texture, the pleasant ache in one's muscles after reading a long story, the ability to be used as a weapon of self-defense in a pinch... can paper compete? No way.
Paper is simply a 'razors and razor blades' technology. Soon I am certain you will see the vendors giving away the paper for free... but they'll charge you for the ink."
Rather than choose to listen to death knells of "the way it was," I find the transitions society is going through fascinating and exciting. Books are a relatively new technology in storytelling, really. In a way, the printing press destroyed the old oral traditions that centered on congregating at the tavern or at communal events. In every fundamental transition, something is "lost" when the new supersedes it. It is the way of the universe, the way of life and death.
Storytelling is morphing again such that the technology of books simply can not keep up as the dominant medium in the long term. The explosion of blogs is proof enough of that. Books will always exist, but they will be relegated to a niche as most of society's stories are told electronically. We already see that happening in the marketplace. It does sadden me because I have always envisioned my name on the spine of a book in a store, but things change and we are in that transition period.
On a more important note, I loved your story of reading and shopping with your daughters. When they were babies, I read seemingly nonstop to my boys, and they still love being read to. They both read with vigor now, even though like yours they'd give their right arm to play more time on Wii or their current hot thing, "Club Penguin." Dear Lord, what a waste of time that is.
Hi guys-
I'm off from work today. Hope you all are having happy Friday!
First - Chris - I gotta say I'm really gonna be upset if Indy has been mishandled. I have some really good memories from the first movies. I'm not going to see it for a few weeks, until it's not crowded.
As for your all's other comments - it seems the thread running through them is - that the print book is in the middle of a territorial retraction- that makes me sad.
I think more than anything - what I hope for is that there's not a death of good prose and good story that can stand the test of time- you know- that add to the body of work considered transcendant. Maybe that's what I'm worried about.
Yeah, WO - you're right with the e-book stuff- I just hope some of those e-books contain words worth reading - that resonate longer than a sitcom's worth of schlock.
Pete- good one with the stone and paper. Made me feel like a fogey, for the first time, in a way that made me laugh!
And yes with the oral traditions and storytelling changes - I kind of think about oral tradition when I'm writing. I like/hope/work toward my prose to have the sound and the rhythm that seem like it/they would come from someone sitting with other souls around a campfire or in a hall somewhere, telling a tale.
I'd love to see that Guttenberg show, WO. We have BBC America - but no access to BBC.
The full prog isn't up on BBC iPlayer, but here's a taster
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/medieval/gutenberg.shtml
I love your writing, Robin.
We walk to the library every single day; my daughter knows exactly where the Dr Suess section is, and is always delighted when she finds a new one. She can't read, but during naptime she sits in her bed and looks at books for an hour. It makes me happier than I can say.
Yesterday in the library I was talking with another mother. I had to laugh because here I was with my two kids, talking with a woman my mother's age who is there with a daughter younger than mine. Motherhood is the great equalizer. She was laughing about how she used to hate reading, but "All teenagers hate reading!" I just smiled. She probably didn't care that I used to stay up until 2 AM reading as a teenager.
All I did (and I'm not exaggerating) from second grade when I discovered the Boxcar Children on was read. Anything and everything. I still do.
While there is a definite shift toward electronic media, I don't think you will see a complete overhaul of the system any time soon.
As long as there are people like us around ; )
Hey again, WO-
I'll give that a shot. Also- can't quite believe I spelled Gutenberg with two t's - as the actor Steve G. spells his name. Wow.
Hi Kiersten,
Well, thank goodnes there's someone left besides me that loves actual, physical books! My girls do, too. I asked my older daughter - who's twenty, so close to your age - and she said she reads quite a bit online - but when she reads a novel - she wants the pages. So her reading choices are, so far, segregated by type of reading.
I also notice more people in Britain still browsing bookshops (do you think that's accurate, WO?)
Maybe it's just where I am - as when we're down in Somerset with my sister-in-law.
I see both sides of this - I think I'm more concerned about quality than the delivery system (at least that's what I think right now, after Pete's stone and paper mention) - although I'll never stop wanting a book.
I love bookstores - I miss the oldies - we had one called W. K. Stewart when I was young, in Louisville. They had all kinds of books just jammed al over the place - it was an adventure to go and visit. I'd stay for hours, and come out with books I'd never have found any other way- from losing myself in the aisles. Damn, that was an amazing thing to be able to do. I like libraries, but I LOVE bookstores.
My husband and I go on dates to the bookstore and just wander around. We separate, meet back up, see who found the weirdest title, and just meander the aisles. You just don't get the same thing on Amazon.
In fact, one of my favorite memories was when my daughter was just tiny and I was at home all day every day and so lonely while Noah was at school and studying. He took me to the bookstore and had me pick out a blank book, then informed me it was time to start writing the book I had been planning out for a year.
Excuse me, I've got to go write a love note to him ; ) I'd write one to the bookstore, too, but I'm guessing they'd rather I just come in and spend money.
Kiersten, I liked your story about the older mom. I was on the other end of it. My first kid was born when I was 42. A few years later we were at the botanic gardens when we saw one of her little friends from preschool and her friend's hot, young mom. Naturally, we had to say hi. On the way over I tripped over a curb, fell, and broke my leg with a pop that could be heard yards away. The afore-mentioned hot, young mom runs over, kneels beside me and asks "Oh, MR. Redfield, are you all right?" MR. Redfield????? My ego was so bruised I walked a half mile to my car on my broken leg and drove to the ER.
Great pic, Robin.
I'm not sure about the browse ratio over here and whether it differs from anywhere else, but it does seem to me that 2nd hand bookshops — those museums of arcane odours and occasional nesting places of twittery old spinsters — are on the wane.
Oh, Mr. Redfield, your story made me laugh.
I don't believe we are in danger of losing our books just yet. Maybe in the future when technology goes leaps and bounds beyond what we have now.
I love my books. I love the smell and feel of them. I hope they never go away while I am still alive.
And Robin, please come to my WEdnesday author blog with the author of the Lolita Effect. It is an important book about media oversexualization of young girls and what we can do about it. Please help me spread the word!
Hey, El -
I'll be there-thanks for letting me know! I won't be able to be on until 5;30 or 6:00 pm but I'll be there.
And it's one of those serendipitous and wonderful things in life that you told me about this- because my next post is about one of my girls reading (and misinterpreting) Lolita, and a few other eye-opening conversations I've had with my girls regarding novels they've read.
Hey WO- I think I've seen a few of those places. I think the rummagers may be looking through the racks in search of memories and familiarity, don't you?
By the way, Robin, I love your method of raising readers. You gave me some great ideas! Your daughters sound like great people.
Hey Kiersten-
I'm so sorry I forgot to tell you how sweet that was - your husband taking you on dates to the bookstore. We do that, too, even though we look through entirley different sections.
And thanks about the girls- I think they're great (but I know, I'm prejudiced!) What I found was that when reading books - as long as we were in their section the children's section- giving them some reading-decision autonomy was a good thing. And then we read aloud everything from some silly Bugs Bunny flip-through-book to classic fairy tales from books I'd had when I was young, and on and on. These are some of my bets memories- even though I had to read that Bugs Bunny book at least
fifty times (no joke) until daughter #1 didn't want to have it read to her any more!
By thirteen, we were discussing Sophie's World and To Kill a Mockingbird, so it all worked out!
My girlfriend and I do dates at the bookstore, too. We usually start in the same section, then wander off, then meet back up and wander off again. I love bookstores so much that I want to own one in my retirement.
I'd also love to read Shakespeare off a mooses arse. Thanks for that, WO!
I devoured books as soon as I got hooked on The Boxcar Children. That was 4th grade for me. Was reading on an adult level in 2 years. My brother hated reading. And I don't remember being read to either. Mom didn't find her love of reading until she was in her 40's.
My ex's son is a game junkie and an adrenaline addict. And he loves to read and be read to.
I think it depends on who you are, not what's around you or how you were or were not read to as a child.
I'm back home, but still working - or avoiding work as the case may be. They called when we got to the airport and said they didn't want us to leave. I left anyway. My boss went back and may be there until Friday. Glad I came home. Seems I still have a job. We'll see if I have one after this week is done.
Hey Sarah,
I agree with you- some people are wired to read and some aren't.
My brother and I have the same parents, we're only four years apart in age, etc. The only books he read in high school had 'Cliff Notes' in the titles, and even those, he only skimmed. He used to pay me to write his English essays and papers for him - it was easy, since I was a card-carrying read-a-holic, I'd ususally already read what he was suppposed to be reading. He got great grades in English- and I got some spare cash.
Like your mom, my brother found out he loved to read about the time he hit his late 30s-early 40s.
Now, he's into it.
And I thought my husband was a fellow read-a-holic when I saw a picture of his study - a picture of his home in Britain. Turned out most of those tomes were golf manuals and other manualized stuff. He laughed when I told him I'd just assumed he had some Chaucer in there.
Now, though, he really enjoys reading actual novels (reading is an infectious disease in our household).
And Hey Sarah- I hope all is well with work - it takes guts to fly on out of there like that.
And I think you'd be a cool bookstore owner.
I used to be a library and bookstore whore before I moved out to the country. Town's not too far away, but the library is small, and there's only one decent bookstore. I rarely browse the aisles anymore. The last print books I got were from Amazon, and I currently have 19 e-books in my TBR pile (although I don't have an e-reader and the laptop just isn't condusive to cuddling up with). I used to love buying books about history and mythology and costuming and other research-y stuff, but now most of the info I need is readily available online.
For me, the experience of reading a print book is wrapped more in the luxury of being able to curl up for a few hours in a comfy chair and simply read. But I'm at a different place in my life now. Maybe in a few years, when I retire, I'll be back in that print-book-only frame of mind. For now, like for your kids, there's just too much competition for what little time there is in a day. Speaking of which, there's chores that need doing now... :o)
It'll be at least another generation before books are in danger because all the readers love real books and are wary of ebooks. And it'll probably be much longer than that. It's not like mp3 players where they took off overnight. Their big draw was you could take all your songs with you anywhere, but no one needs to take all their books with them to the supermarket or the gym. With books, the biggest requirement and/or turnoff for people is time. At least that's what I hear. "I'd like to read more, but I don't have the time..." So until we reach the point where we're uploading novels directly into our brains, I think books are safe. But even then there will still be people who want them, or there will be some use for them. After all, you CAN still read newly written text on stone. You just have to be looking at a memorial or in a cemetery to do it.
My daughter's three and she loves books and has some lovely books. Picture books for kids just have to be on paper (or board). I read to her every night. When I'm travelling, my wife reads to her. And some stuff you can only do with books. Look at Robert Sabuda's wonderful pop-up books. I loved pop-up books when I was a kid. The pop-up Kama Sutra is still one of my favorites.
I don't know what the recipe is for keeping kids interested in reading books when there are so many other things for them to do. But I owe it to mine to at least get her started and show her the way.
E-books wiil take a large share of the market away from paper books.
The quality will suffer and the chances for new writers to "break in" will be virtually eliminated in this new market, IMO.
Because:
1. Every Celebrity in the world will have an e-book ghost-written for them.
2. With millions of unedited (by a peofessional) books available with this new format; 99.9999% of them will be garbage. People will discover this fact real quick, and steer clear of anything not released by a major publishing house.
3. Most books released by the major publishing houses will be either a big name, or an editor's spouse, relative or significant other (much like it is today).
But luckily, the paper books will still maintain 60-70% of the market for the next 20 years (Thank God for libraries and old readers).
Hi you all-
Phoenix - I figured you had to be a person who loves to peruse the shelves - couldn't imagine you NOT doing this! I hadn't factore in the rural lifestyle- but hey- there's Amazon, and that's a kind of perusal - although I still prefer the bookstore, unless I'm going for a specific book - then I call ahead to 'my' bookstor- if they don't have it, Amazon gets my vote and my money.
Hope you can take some time to do some curling up! I call that a psyche necessity, girl!
BT, I hope you're right- I really do! In a perfect world (my version) - books on paper and with a nice spine holding them together just can't be replaced. It's the tactile aspect, and the portability- not to mention the inside cover being handy to write page numbers down that really hold meaning.
And Lyle, I think what you said makes sense- Will ebooks - those published this way- not 'tranferred' into this medium -be of the same quality - authors- editors- the whole enchilada?
My time is meaningful to me- as everyone's is - I'm not gonna read schlock. I'm just not going to.
Phoenix has e-books, though, and she's definitely a discerning reader- so... I guess we'll see how it plays out.
Hi ril - Somehow I knew you'd read to you little girl - not that that was any great leap of high intelligence on my part, given your personality, from what I know, anyway!
Pop up kama sutra - hell- I need to order that one. My husband would love it. Maybe for Christmas.
I'll be surprised, really, as much as so many Boomers and children of boomers love to read, if, when the dust settles on all the techno stuff, reading books isn't left standing. I really will. I think it's a cycle.
I do think books will be around for a long time to come, but I also think transition will happen faster than many people expect.
I got my first Apple computer approximately 28 years ago, before the Mac was even released. I didn't get my first modem for another five years. It was 1981 when the University of California had their first electronic card catalog, and you had to be in the library to use it.
What an amazing amount of change can happen in just 25 years.
BT's got a good point with the reason the iPod took off. While he's right that we don't need to carry all our books with us at once, there are several factors that will drive books to become electronic. Environmental concerns. The costs of warehousing and shipping. The shortening attention spans of the population. Internationalization. And, finally, rapid improvements in technology.
I see people all the time watching TV shows and even blockbuster movies on screens no bigger than the palms of their hands, with the sound coming through tiny earphones. Certainly the experience suffers, not being in the theater with the smell of fake popcorn butter and the squelch of sneakers on sticky floors and the gasps and chuckles of the other moviegoers. But people do this now.
Please don't mistake my position on this as one of "nobody cares about the experience of reading books." Certainly they (we) do. Just as technology improves and the world changes around us, we (as a society) will come to care more about other things such as convenience and economics and universal access and format hopping.
And, it will be driven by consumers, not by technology companies or big publishers. We're seeing it already as Borders is having problems, as independent booksellers and used book stores go out of business. There's nobody forcing this change on people, nobody deciding that paper books are bad and ebooks are good. It's just evolution.
So, my choices for books here are somewhat constrained. There are a handful of bookshops that have an "English" or "Foreign" section. Most of them tend to stock the usual Airport paperbacks. There's one big shop that has a better selection. But books are heavy and cost a lot to import, so English books are expensive here.
I can order from Amazon (Japan, UK, or US) and get the books delivered to my home. Either I pay a mark-up from Amazon JP, or pay high shipping costs from overseas. Still not great.
I would love to be able to download good books into a book reader that was as readable as a real paper book. The Sony reader is supposed to be OK, as is the Kindle, so I've heard. Kindle is US only though. Sony reader is also tough to get hold of, and I've heard it has an irritating "flash" every time you "turn the page". And it costs $300. So if I'm paying full retail for an e-book because they don't seem to get the same discounts as paper (go figure), on top of $300 for the reader, the financials just don't work.
I can't and won't read a book on a regular computer screen. Just doesn't work.
Luckily, I travel to the US four or five times a year and can visit Borders and pick up a few titles to carry back.
Paper isn't in danger just yet, methinks.
My son is 13 now, definitely after the onslaught of MP3 and Gamethings. I won't pretend he doesn't love them to bits and I do have to limit his time on the computer.
But he does love books. For my birthday, he was thrilled that he spotted the third book of a trilogy he'd recommended to me. Over the weekend, he read American Shaolin cover to cover. He's taken to grumbling about his favourite authors not writing fast enough. If we are in London, he'll beg to spend an afternoon in Borders going through the book (and he'll spend his allowance on books on top of the three or four that I agree to buy for him).
He read Little Brother online - but complained about it and said I was lucky that I got to print it out. So that's one techno-obsessed kid voting for paper.
I don't think there's a real risk just yet.
Hi Sylvia!
I'm so happy to see you - and I'm really happy to hear about your son and his paper preference when it comes to reading books.
That's the way my daughters are as well - they love the gadgets and games - but they want their novels on paper.
Child doesn't know how to read yet...but so far has a great love of books. And I gladly read him whatever he wants. Our bedtime reading has increased to 3 books (surely a stalling tactic as much as a love for reading, but I'll take it!).
And I can't imagine reading children's books via Kindle or PC or other electronic device.
I also can't imagine reading that way for myself. Yes, my house is overrun by books...but I need to hold them...I need to turn pages.
I'm with you, precie.
I really am.
Post a Comment